I know a lot of readers come here for photography or cooking content, but I’m going to actually talk about something technical: SQL Joins.
Now, I know if you’re a modern developer and doing stuff like kafka, boltdb, redis, or whatever, you might be asking yourself “what is a join? is that when you add more latency to a cluster by spinning up more nodes?” and you would be wise to ask yourself that. However, I’m talking about relational database joins so feel free to just close the tab.
The request was pretty simple on the surface - “Someone in marketing wants to know the first rating associated with our burrito sales”. Cool. Being a SQL dinogator, I instantly went to a CTE to accomplish this:
WITH oldest_rating AS ( SELECT id, burrito_id, rating , ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY burrito_id ORDER BY created_at) AS seq FROM burrito_ratings ) SELECT c.id, title, sale_price, old.rating FROM burrito_sales c INNER JOIN oldest_rating old ON c.id = old.burrito_id and old.seq = 1 WHERE c.id in (1,2,3);
This works. I sent it back to the marketing team and went back to browsing newegg. An hour or so later, I was paged for a performance problem. This wasn’t for a report or a one-off query… marketing wanted to put this on a public page to show initial ratings to customers over a date range - this query was running slower than the JVM starting up and starting to buckle the available worker processes.
I run a quick explain:
(cost=7383.98..8439.45 rows=1 width=44)
rows = 1… that’s not good. Well, it’s a known feature with CTE’s and perfectly fine for a one-off query I thought this would be. Reality disagreed with me again. The good news here is that since almost all technical business problems have been solved, I don’t have to run the company into the ground trying to force a new architecture… I can just rewrite the query. This a perfect excuse to use a lateral join.
SELECT b.id, title, sale_price, old.rating FROM burrito_sales b CROSS JOIN LATERAL ( SELECT rating FROM burrito_ratings WHERE burrito_id = b.id ORDER BY created_at LIMIT 1 ) old WHERE b.id IN (1,2,3);
Results look good, let’s check out execution plan:
Nested Loop (cost=0.83..10.27 rows=3 width=44)
Hey! Much better. Hell, we could put this on the landing page. Ok, time to hand this query off and get back to surfing - uh oh, just got paged again:
‘OUR ORM DOESNT KNOW WHAT A CROSS JOIN IS. PLEASE PUT RESULTS IN KAFKA’
Time for me to go flag down a meteor.